Positive Depression Screening at the First Prenatal Visit in a Low-Income Primarily Black Population.

This study documents prevalence of positive depression screens at the first prenatal visit in an urban, low-income, and primarily Black population as part of initiatives to strengthen mental health services in a region with high rates of race disparities in infant and maternal mortality. We conducted a cross-sectional chart review of 500 patients, collecting demographics, medical histories, and scores of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS), the instrument recommended for use during pregnancy by national United States organizations. Of those with a completed EPDS (n=414), 32% screened positive (n=131). These women were more likely to have smoked (p=.02), used illicit drugs (p=.01), or had depression (p<.0001), anxiety (p=.0004), bipolar disorder (p=.02), or postpartum depression for the subgroup with prior pregnancies (p<.0001). A high percentage of patients had positive EPDS screens, highlighting the need for better integration of mental health services into prenatal care for vulnerable populations.

Obese But Fit: The Relationship of Fitness to Metabolically Healthy But Obese Status among Sexual Minority Women.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to describe fitness characteristics of metabolically healthy sexual minority women who are obese. METHODS: As part of the Healthy Weight in Lesbian and Bisexual Women Initiative funded by the U.S. Office on Women's Health, one site enrolled self-identified lesbian or bisexual women age 40 and older in a randomized controlled trial that evaluated interventions to improve health. Women with waist-to-height ratio of 0.5 or greater were classified as obese. Women without diabetes or cardiovascular disease and with normal range fasting blood level measurements of glucose, triglycerides, high-density cholesterol, and blood pressure were classified as metabolically healthy but obese (MHO). Otherwise, women were classified as metabolically unhealthy obese (MUHO). Fitness measurements included predicted VO2 maximum, 1-minute heart rate recovery, and strength (single maximal leg lift and chest press). Self-reported demographic and physical activity level data were obtained by standardized questionnaires. RESULTS: Of the 53 participants who completed the eligibility screener in Columbia, Missouri, 47 were enrolled in the study (89% participation proportion) with 45 categorized as obese. Approximately one-third (38%) were MHO. The majority of MHO and MUHO participants ranked poor or very poor on a composite fitness score that included measures of strength, flexibility, and aerobic fitness (75.0% and 77.8%, respectively). In the logistic regression models, better 1-minute heart rate recovery after peak exercise performance was significantly associated with MHO individuals (odds ratio, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.13-9.10) compared with MUHO. No other fitness measure was significantly different between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Consistent with other studies, we identified more than one-third of our obese sexual minority women as MHO. Fitness measures may be potential predictors of MHO status because one measure, heart rate recovery, was significantly associated with MHO status. With the population prevalence of obesity high and even higher among lesbian or bisexual women, sexual minority women are an ideal population for a longitudinal study to better understand MHO characteristics.

Coaching intervention as a strategy for minority recruitment to cancer clinical trials.

PURPOSE: Lack of trust and rapport with health care providers has been identified in the under-representation of racial/ethnic minorities within clinical trials. Our study used a coach to promote trust among minority patients with advanced cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Minority patients with advanced breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate carcinoma were randomly assigned to receive a coach Intervention (CI) or usual care (UC). All patients completed baseline and 6-month telephone interviews to assess demographics, trust in health care providers, attitudes toward clinical trials, and quality of life. Patients randomly assigned to CI were assigned a coach, who made biweekly contacts for 6 months to address general issues, progress or development in cancer care, and available resources. Patients randomly assigned to UC received the standard of care, without this intervention. Clinical trial enrollment was assessed. RESULTS: Over 21 months, we screened 268 patients and enrolled 73 African Americans and two Asian Americans. Patients were randomly assigned to CI (n = 38) or to UC (n = 37). Longitudinal analyses were conducted on 69 patients who completed the 6-month follow-up assessment. Trial enrollment was 16 and 13 patients for the CI and UC groups, respectively. This difference was not significant (P = .351). Higher quality of life (1-point odds ratio on Functional Assessment of Cancer Treatment-General = 1.033, P = .036) and positive attitudes toward trials predicted enrollment. There was no significant difference between these groups in quality of life, attitudes toward clinical trials, perceptions of racism, trust in doctors, or depression. CONCLUSIONS: Quality of life and positive attitude toward trials predicted trial enrollment, regardless of assignment to CI or UC.

More than Tuskegee: understanding mistrust about research participation.

This paper describes results of a qualitative study that explored barriers to research participation among African American adults. A purposive sampling strategy was used to identify African American adults with and without previous research experience. A total of 11 focus groups were conducted. Groups ranged in size from 4-10 participants (N=70). Mistrust of the health care system emerged as a primary barrier to participation in medical research among participants in our study. Mistrust stems from historical events including the Tuskegee syphilis study and is reinforced by health system issues and discriminatory events that continue to this day. Mistrust was an important barrier expressed across all groups regardless of prior research participation or socioeconomic status. This study illustrates the multifaceted nature of mistrust, and suggests that mistrust remains an important barrier to research participation. Researchers should incorporate strategies to reduce mistrust and thereby increase participation among African Americans.

Barriers and facilitators of African American participation in Alzheimer disease biomarker research.

African Americans experience a greater risk of Alzheimer disease (AD), but are underrepresented in AD research. Our study examined barriers and facilitators of AD research participation among African Americans. Investigators conducted 11 focus groups with African American participants (n=70) who discussed barriers and facilitators to AD research participation including lumbar puncture studies. The moderator and comoderator independently reviewed the transcripts, identified themes, and coded transcripts for analysis. Participants were predominately female (73%) with a mean age of 52 years (range 21 to 86 y). Concerns and attitudes were consistent across education, socioeconomic status, and sex. Mistrust was a fundamental reason for nonparticipation. Additional barriers included insufficient information dissemination in the African American community, inconvenience, and reputation of the researcher and research institution. Barriers to participation in AD biomarker studies were fear of the unknown and adverse effects. Altruism and relevance of research projects to the individual, family members, or the African American community facilitate participation. Increased participation results from relationships with the community that extend beyond immediate research interests, dissemination of research findings, and emphasis on relevance of proposed studies. Pervasive barriers impede African American participation in AD research but can be overcome through a sustained presence in the community.